Israeli security officials are expressing concern that a potential nuclear agreement between the United States and Iran would fail to address Jerusalem's key strategic priorities, including Tehran's nuclear program, missile development, and support for regional proxy forces.

According to sources familiar with the matter, any emerging deal between Washington and Tehran is unlikely to satisfy Israel's core demands regarding Iranian military capabilities and regional activities. The assessment comes as diplomatic channels between the U.S. and Iran have shown signs of renewed engagement following years of tensions.

Israel has consistently maintained three primary security concerns regarding Iran: the advancement of its nuclear program toward weapons capability, the development and proliferation of long-range ballistic missiles, and Tehran's ongoing support for militant organizations throughout the Middle East, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and various militia groups in Syria and Iraq.

Israeli officials have long argued that any comprehensive agreement with Iran must address all three pillars of the threat. However, preliminary indications suggest that discussions between Washington and Tehran may focus primarily on nuclear enrichment limits, potentially leaving missile development and proxy support outside the scope of a new accord.

The concern in Jerusalem is that a limited agreement could provide Iran with sanctions relief and economic benefits without securing meaningful restrictions on its broader military activities in the region. Israeli security experts warn that such an outcome could embolden Tehran and strengthen its ability to support proxy forces that directly threaten Israeli security.

This latest development adds to the complex security landscape facing Israel, which has repeatedly stated it reserves the right to act independently to protect its interests regardless of international agreements with Iran.

The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), from which the United States withdrew in 2018, similarly drew Israeli criticism for its sunset clauses and failure to address Iran's missile program and regional activities. Any new agreement would likely face similar scrutiny from Jerusalem, which views the Iranian nuclear program as an existential threat.